Selling into Canada

38records

What it rests on
A5 on a primary document or a measured outcome
B33 on our own systematic observation
C0 on named expert judgement
D0 on inference or a single instance
How current it is
Verified to September 9, 2026Every record here is rechecked on its own clock. The oldest reading in this brief was taken August 5, 2026; the dial shows how far through its interval the record closest to expiring has run.
Extra rules by where you are coming from

These sit on top of the general rules for Canada. They do not replace them.

What we have not done

Everything here was gathered for these categories:

  • Beauty & personal care
  • Consumer electronics
  • Sports & outdoor
  • Apparel & accessories
  • Toys, games & hobby
  • Home, furniture & kitchen
  • DIY, tools & building
  • Lawn, garden & plants
  • Automotive & mobility
  • Household & home care
  • Food & snacks
  • Agriculture & livestock (upstream)
  • Ingredients & materials
  • Health & medical products
  • Pet
  • Beverages

Rules written for a category we have not read may bind you and are not in this brief. This market is on a refresh cycle, so records here are rechecked rather than left to age. Nothing in this brief carries a named expert's judgement yet, so every reading is a document or a measurement, never somebody's experience of selling here.

Will stop you

3 records

Get these wrong and the product does not ship, or it ships and comes back.

Every required word on the pack, twice
Beauty & personal careDepartment of Justice Canada (Justice Laws Website)

Information that the Cosmetic Regulations require on the label of a cosmetic must be shown both in English and in French, with the INCI name the only exception, and no cosmetic may be sold in Canada unless it is labelled in accordance with those Regulations.

This is a packaging cost rather than a filing cost, so it is the rule most likely to be discovered after artwork is approved, and the exemption for INCI names is why an ingredient list can look compliant while the panel beside it is not.

93A
Saying not tested on animals creates a burden of proof
Beauty & personal careDepartment of Justice Canada (Justice Laws Website)

Canada prohibits making a claim on the label of or in an advertisement for a cosmetic that is likely to create an impression that it was not tested on animals unless the person has evidence that no such testing occurred, and requires that evidence to be produced to the Minister on request.

The phrase means nothing in the United States and is a documented, on-demand evidentiary burden two hours north, so a single North American label is a decision about which regime the copy has to survive.

92A
Safety has to be provable without animal data
Beauty & personal careDepartment of Justice Canada (Justice Laws Website)1 caveat

Canada prohibits selling a cosmetic unless its safety can be established without relying on data derived from a test conducted on an animal that could cause pain, suffering or injury, and separately prohibits conducting such a test to meet a cosmetic safety requirement under Canadian law or that of a foreign state.

The second half is the one that travels: a test run abroad to satisfy another country’s cosmetic safety regime is itself prohibited conduct here, so an overseas filing strategy is not neutral in Canada.

92A

Will cost you

18 records

Survivable, but you pay for it in margin, rework or returns.

Show 6 more

Will slow you down

17 records

Not fatal. Enough to make a launch feel harder than it should.

Show 5 more

Take this brief

  • CA.jsonEvery Canada record with its evidence and falsifier.
  • CA.mdThe same brief as markdown, written to paste into a model.

Free to quote, cite and act on; not to resell. Licence and source terms. Cite as: The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, Orbt, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129, retrieved September 9, 2026. If a record here is wrong, its falsifier tells you exactly what to send to hello@tryorbt.com.