Open Orbt
MarketsPublicationsAboutPricing
Open OrbtBook a demo
Expensive to get wrongUnited StatesBeauty & personal care

Subscription is not the default US beauty model

Recurring purchase is not how US beauty direct-to-consumer is built: 10 of 47 storefronts run a subscription platform, and a further 10 mention subscribing in copy without one installed.

A US entry plan whose unit economics assume subscription retention is assuming a behaviour the category has not built the plumbing for.

87

87 of a possible 90Tier B, systematic first-party observation. Nothing at this tier is allowed past 90, however good it looks.

Verified September 9, 2026Rechecked every 120 days, next by January 7, 2027.

Structure

Held since August 5, 2026How the market is physically or commercially arranged. The earliest date we are willing to say this held. It may well have been true before that; we do not backdate a record past the evidence we have read. Supported, version 6.

This entry is wrong if

A repeat run detects a named subscription platform on more than half of the same storefront set.

Written before the record was published, not after. If you can show this, send it to hello@tryorbt.com and the correction goes on the record with the entry.

Evidence

  1. Tier Bobserved-webn = 47

    orbt: Market Register commerce collector, run commerce-20260805140548

    Subscription platform detected on: Mixsoon, Rovectin, Glossier, ILIA, Summer Fridays, Necessaire, Krave Beauty, Herbivore, Milk Makeup, Ursa Major. Detected from script hosts, not from copy. Run commerce-20260805140548.

    Read 2026-08-05 · CC BY · page hash 9a6ccfd5ea85

History

  1. v6corrected

    Correction. The retirement recorded above was an operator error, not a finding. The derivation was run against collector run commerce-20260805053004 while that crawl was still in flight and had reached 4 of 66 storefronts, so every claim whose storefronts it had not yet read failed its sample gate and was retired. 44 claims were retired in one command for that reason. The claim was re-derived the same day from collector run commerce-20260805051110, a complete 66 of 66 crawl, and holds. Nothing about the market changed between the two records. The retirement stays in this log because the log is not edited; this entry is what it means. The instrument now refuses to derive from a run missing more than a tenth of the seeded storefronts, and a claim returning from retired now files its own status revision, which is why this correction had to be written by hand rather than appearing on its own.

  2. v5retired

    Retired against collector run commerce-20260805053004: only 2 US storefronts, need 12. The claim held on the sample available when it was written and does not hold on this one.

    What it said before

    Recurring purchase is not how US beauty direct-to-consumer is built: 10 of 47 storefronts run a subscription platform, and a further 10 mention subscribing in copy without one installed.

  3. v4corrected

    Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260805005712; figures moved.

    What it said before

    Recurring purchase is not how US beauty direct-to-consumer is built: 10 of 52 storefronts run a subscription platform, and a further 10 mention subscribing in copy without one installed.

  4. v3corrected

    Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260804224019; figures moved.

    What it said before

    Recurring purchase is not how US beauty direct-to-consumer is built: 10 of 53 storefronts run a subscription platform, and a further 10 mention subscribing in copy without one installed.

  5. v2corrected

    Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260804223321; figures moved.

    What it said before

    Recurring purchase is not how US beauty direct-to-consumer is built: 4 of 26 storefronts run a subscription platform, and a further 7 mention subscribing in copy without one installed.

  6. v1created

    Derived from collector run commerce-20260804203300.

Append-only. Nothing in this list is edited or removed once written, including the entries that record our own mistakes. Every change to every record is on the corrections page, and the same log is in entries.json under revisions.

  • subscription
  • retention
  • unit-economics
  • dtc
  • beauty

Cite this entry

“Subscription is not the default US beauty model”, The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, entry omr:us:subscription-is-not-the-default-us-beauty-model, retrieved September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--subscription-is-not-the-default-us-beauty-model. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129

For a deck, a brief or a chat.

Free to quote, cite and act on. Not to resell or redistribute — the sources ask that of us, and each one’s terms are named. Machine-readable: entries.json carries this record under the id omr:us:subscription-is-not-the-default-us-beauty-model, with the same evidence and falsifier.

Read next

Also true of the United States

What else we hold on this market, heaviest first.

Everything we hold on United StatesEvery record for this corridor