You may pay for a review, not for a good one
The same FTC rule prohibits businesses from providing compensation or other incentives conditioned on a consumer review expressing a particular sentiment, positive or negative, and states that the condition may be conveyed implicitly as well as expressly.
The common loyalty mechanic of points for a five-star review is the thing this prohibits, and “implicitly conveyed” means the wording of the email is the evidence.
95 of a possible 97Tier A, primary document or measured outcome. Nothing at this tier is allowed past 97, however good it looks.
Verified August 5, 2026Rechecked every 180 days, next by February 1, 2027.
Held since October 21, 2024A rule, law or policy that limits what you may do or say. The earliest date we are willing to say this held. It may well have been true before that; we do not backdate a record past the evidence we have read. Supported, version 1.
This entry is wrong if
The FTC withdraws the sentiment-conditioning provision, or states that incentives conditioned on positive reviews are permitted.
Written before the record was published, not after. If you can show this, send it to hello@tryorbt.com and the correction goes on the record with the entry.
Evidence
- Tier Aregulation
U.S. Federal Trade Commission: Final Rule Banning Fake Reviews and Testimonials
The final rule prohibits businesses from providing compensation or other incentives conditioned on the writing of consumer reviews expressing a particular sentiment, either positive or negative. It clarifies that the conditional nature of the offer of compensation or incentive may be expressly or implicitly conveyed.
Read 2026-08-05 · Public domain · page hash
5b8afaf9a768
History
- v1created
Initial entry from primary regulator text, read 2026-08-04.
Append-only. Nothing in this list is edited or removed once written, including the entries that record our own mistakes. Every change to every record is on the corrections page, and the same log is in entries.json under revisions.
Cite this entry
“You may pay for a review, not for a good one”, The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, entry omr:us:review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment, retrieved September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129
Orbt, "You may pay for a review, not for a good one," Orbt Market Index, entry omr:us:review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment, verified August 5, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment.
@misc{orbt-us-review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment,
title = {You may pay for a review, not for a good one},
author = {{Orbt}},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.22679129},
note = {The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0 (dataset DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22679129), entry omr:us:review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment. Verified 2026-08-05},
howpublished = {\url{https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment}},
license = {Orbt Index Public Licence. Free to quote and cite; not to redistribute}
}For a deck, a brief or a chat.
Free to quote, cite and act on. Not to resell or redistribute — the sources ask that of us, and each one’s terms are named. Machine-readable: entries.json carries this record under the id omr:us:review-incentives-cannot-be-conditioned-on-sentiment, with the same evidence and falsifier.
Read next
Also true of the United States
What else we hold on this market, heaviest first.
- United StatesBuying or selling fake reviews is a finable offence
- United StatesA filtered review wall is a misrepresentation
- United StatesThe US: not a metric market in practice
- United StatesUS green claims run on guidance from 2012
- United StatesChina-made: 54% of United States recalls
- United StatesTaiwan-made: 5% of United States recalls
Everything we hold on United StatesEvery record for this corridor