Beauty brands do not name regulators in product copy
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,864 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
A Korean brand that leads with its KFDA functional-cosmetic status is using the one credential the American shelf has agreed not to claim, and reads as either confused or evasive rather than approved.
- Contests FDA registration is not FDA approval
78 of a possible 90Tier B, systematic first-party observation. Nothing at this tier is allowed past 90, however good it looks.
Verified September 9, 2026Rechecked every 120 days, next by January 7, 2027.
Held since August 5, 2026What causes offence or backlash here. The earliest date we are willing to say this held. It may well have been true before that; we do not backdate a record past the evidence we have read. Supported, version 7.
This entry is wrong if
A repeat run finds any of the three names on more than 2% of products in the same storefront set.
Written before the record was published, not after. If you can show this, send it to hello@tryorbt.com and the correction goes on the record with the entry.
Evidence
- Tier Bobserved-webn = 4864
orbt: Market Register commerce collector, run commerce-20260805140548
Counted in product feed text only. Regulatory language on a policy page, an ingredient panel or a compliance footer is out of scope and is not evidence against this. Run commerce-20260805140548.
Read 2026-08-05 · CC BY · page hash
9a6ccfd5ea85
History
- v7corrected
Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260805140548 after a change to the instrument: added the product page as a readable surface: the same page the collector already fetched for its JSON-LD, now read for the ingredient list, the drug label, the directions and the claim words a shopper actually sees. The figures moved for that reason. Any part of the change attributable to the market moving cannot be separated from it in this revision, and the previous statement is recorded below rather than replaced.
What it said before
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,867 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
- v6corrected
Correction. The retirement recorded above was an operator error, not a finding. The derivation was run against collector run commerce-20260805053004 while that crawl was still in flight and had reached 4 of 66 storefronts, so every claim whose storefronts it had not yet read failed its sample gate and was retired. 44 claims were retired in one command for that reason. The claim was re-derived the same day from collector run commerce-20260805051110, a complete 66 of 66 crawl, and holds. Nothing about the market changed between the two records. The retirement stays in this log because the log is not edited; this entry is what it means. The instrument now refuses to derive from a run missing more than a tenth of the seeded storefronts, and a claim returning from retired now files its own status revision, which is why this correction had to be written by hand rather than appearing on its own.
- v5retired
Retired against collector run commerce-20260805053004: only 2 readable catalogues, need 20. The claim held on the sample available when it was written and does not hold on this one.
What it said before
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,867 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
- v4corrected
Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260805040124 after a change to the instrument: read the agent-commerce capability manifest and the sitemap index on every platform, so a Cafe24 404 is recorded as the observation it is The figures moved for that reason. Any part of the change attributable to the market moving cannot be separated from it in this revision, and the previous statement is recorded below rather than replaced.
What it said before
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,864 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
- v3corrected
Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260805033624 after a change to the instrument: extract the jurisdiction a governing-law clause names, not just that one exists The figures moved for that reason. Any part of the change attributable to the market moving cannot be separated from it in this revision, and the previous statement is recorded below rather than replaced.
What it said before
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,863 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
- v2corrected
Re-derived from collector run commerce-20260805025415 after a change to the instrument: Adds the Shopify return-policy family: four corridor claims on sealed-goods conditions, the 30-day window, transit-liability topics and policy length. The figures moved for that reason. Any part of the change attributable to the market moving cannot be separated from it in this revision, and the previous statement is recorded below rather than replaced.
What it said before
Naming a regulator or a rating body in product copy is something US-facing beauty brands do not do: across 4,853 products from 40 storefronts, the three names together account for 26 product mentions, 0.2% for FDA, 0% for KFDA, 0.3% for EWG.
- v1created
Derived from collector run commerce-20260805015420.
Append-only. Nothing in this list is edited or removed once written, including the entries that record our own mistakes. Every change to every record is on the corrections page, and the same log is in entries.json under revisions.
Cite this entry
“Beauty brands do not name regulators in product copy”, The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, entry omr:us:regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy, retrieved September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129
Orbt, "Beauty brands do not name regulators in product copy," Orbt Market Index, entry omr:us:regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy, verified September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy.
@misc{orbt-us-regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy,
title = {Beauty brands do not name regulators in product copy},
author = {{Orbt}},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.22679129},
note = {The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0 (dataset DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22679129), entry omr:us:regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy. Verified 2026-09-09},
howpublished = {\url{https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/us--regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy}},
license = {Orbt Index Public Licence. Free to quote and cite; not to redistribute}
}For a deck, a brief or a chat.
Free to quote, cite and act on. Not to resell or redistribute — the sources ask that of us, and each one’s terms are named. Machine-readable: entries.json carries this record under the id omr:us:regulator-names-are-absent-from-beauty-product-copy, with the same evidence and falsifier.
Read next
Also true of the United States
What else we hold on this market, heaviest first.
- United StatesFacility registration renews every two years
- United StatesEvery product listed with FDA, ingredients included
- United StatesFDA can recall a cosmetic and suspend the facility
- United StatesA Korean plant is a US facility under MoCRA
- United StatesSerious adverse events report in 15 business days
- United StatesFDA registration is not FDA approval
Everything we hold on United StatesEvery record for this corridor