Expensive to get wrongSouth Korea

Korea’s pack names every ingredient and the status

The Cosmetics Act requires the outer package of a cosmetic to state the product name, the trade name and address of the business operator, all ingredients used in manufacturing it, the volume or weight, the batch number, the use-by date or period after opening, the price, cautions for use, and for a functional cosmetic the words “functional cosmetic” or the Ministry’s logo.

The regulatory status has to appear on the front of the pack rather than in a file, so a product’s classification becomes a visible design constraint and one that a shopper, a competitor and a regulator can all check from a photograph.

93

93 of a possible 97Tier A, primary document or measured outcome. Nothing at this tier is allowed past 97, however good it looks.

Verified August 6, 2026Rechecked every 365 days, next by August 6, 2027.

Constraint

Held since February 1, 2012A rule, law or policy that limits what you may do or say. The earliest date we are willing to say this held. It may well have been true before that; we do not backdate a record past the evidence we have read. Supported, version 1.

This entry is wrong if

Article 10(1) is amended to drop the full-ingredient requirement, or to remove the obligation to mark a functional cosmetic as such on the package.

Written before the record was published, not after. If you can show this, send it to hello@tryorbt.com and the correction goes on the record with the entry.

Evidence

  1. Tier Aregulation

    Korea Ministry of Government Legislation (National Law Information Center): Cosmetics Act (Act No. 20901), English translation

    1. Name of the cosmetic; 2. Trade name and address of the business operator; 3. All ingredients used in manufacturing the relevant cosmetic (excluding ingredients prescribed by Prime Ministerial Decree, such as trace ingredients that are not harmful to the human body); 4. Volume or weight of contents; 5. Batch number; 6. Use-by date or the period after opening; 7. Price; 8. For a functional cosmetic, the word “functional cosmetic” or the logo determined by the Minister of Food and Drug Safety indicating that the product is a functional cosmetic; 9. Cautions for use; 10. Other matters prescribed by Prime Ministerial Decree.

    Article 10(1). The exclusions in item 3 and the small-package relief in the proviso are both delegated to Prime Ministerial Decree, whose English translation the register flags as historical, so this claim does not state what they contain.

    Read 2026-08-06 · Open government · page hash 92590839801f

History

  1. v1created

    Initial entry from the Korean government's own English translation of the Cosmetics Act, read 2026-08-06 through the National Law Information Center Open API (target=elaw), which flags this text 현행, currently in force. Articles were taken from the publisher's own markup rather than split out of flattened text.

Append-only. Nothing in this list is edited or removed once written, including the entries that record our own mistakes. Every change to every record is on the corrections page, and the same log is in entries.json under revisions.

  • kr
  • korea
  • labelling
  • ingredients
  • packaging
  • compliance

Cite this entry

“Korea’s pack names every ingredient and the status”, The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, entry omr:kr:the-label-must-name-every-ingredient, retrieved September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/kr--the-label-must-name-every-ingredient. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129

For a deck, a brief or a chat.

Free to quote, cite and act on. Not to resell or redistribute — the sources ask that of us, and each one’s terms are named. Machine-readable: entries.json carries this record under the id omr:kr:the-label-must-name-every-ingredient, with the same evidence and falsifier.

Read next

Everything we hold on South KoreaEvery record for this corridor