Kenya regulates electronics for quality
When Kenya files a rule touching consumer electronics, the objective it states most often is quality requirements: 61% of 71 filings that state any objective. Next is harmonisation and trade facilitation at 55%. The objective is the filer’s own, from the WTO’s fixed vocabulary; a filing can state several.
Quality objectives are answered by conforming to a standard, which usually means paying a certification body.
69 of a possible 90Tier B, systematic first-party observation. Nothing at this tier is allowed past 90, however good it looks.
Verified September 9, 2026Rechecked every 365 days, next by September 9, 2027.
Held since January 1, 1995How the market is physically or commercially arranged. The earliest date we are willing to say this held. It may well have been true before that; we do not backdate a record past the evidence we have read. Supported, version 1.
This entry is wrong if
Recomputing stated objectives over this market’s WTO filings in this industry returns a different leading objective, or the same one outside 56% to 66%.
Written before the record was published, not after. If you can show this, send it to hello@tryorbt.com and the correction goes on the record with the entry.
Evidence
- Tier Bregulationn = 43
World Trade Organization: ePing SPS & TBT notification register
43 WTO filings stating this objective, counted in the register on 2026-09-09.
Read 2026-09-09 · Open government · about this source
History
- v1created
Derived from the regulatory-intent family on 2026-08-10.
Append-only. Nothing in this list is edited or removed once written, including the entries that record our own mistakes. Every change to every record is on the corrections page, and the same log is in entries.json under revisions.
Cite this entry
“Kenya regulates electronics for quality”, The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0, entry omr:ke:electronics:regulatory-intent, retrieved September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/ke--electronics--regulatory-intent. Dataset: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22679129
Orbt, "Kenya regulates electronics for quality," Orbt Market Index, entry omr:ke:electronics:regulatory-intent, verified September 9, 2026, https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/ke--electronics--regulatory-intent.
@misc{orbt-ke-electronics-regulatory-intent,
title = {Kenya regulates electronics for quality},
author = {{Orbt}},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.22679129},
note = {The Orbt Market Index 0.1.0 (dataset DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22679129), entry omr:ke:electronics:regulatory-intent. Verified 2026-09-09},
howpublished = {\url{https://tryorbt.com/markets/entry/ke--electronics--regulatory-intent}},
license = {Orbt Index Public Licence. Free to quote and cite; not to redistribute}
}For a deck, a brief or a chat.
Free to quote, cite and act on. Not to resell or redistribute — the sources ask that of us, and each one’s terms are named. Machine-readable: entries.json carries this record under the id omr:ke:electronics:regulatory-intent, with the same evidence and falsifier.
Read next
Why markets regulate electronics, by marketThis entry is one row of 27. The whole table, ranked, with every source.The same measure, elsewhere
We asked this of 27 markets. Here is where the answer differs most.
- United StatesUnited States regulates electronics for environment
- IsraelIsrael regulates electronics for safety
- ChinaChina regulates electronics for safety
- EcuadorEcuador regulates electronics for consumer
- BrazilBrazil regulates electronics for quality
- KazakhstanKazakhstan regulates electronics for safety
Also true of Kenya
What else we hold on this market, heaviest first.